BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF TEACHER-STUDENT INTERACTION THROUGH VIRTUAL PLATFORMS

Main Article Content

Manuel Andrés Llerena Paz
Manuel Esteban Arévalo Avecillas

Abstract

The evolution of web 4.0 technologies is the next great advance in virtual platforms and will focus on offering a smarter, more predictive behavior, so that we can, just by making an affirmation or request, put in place a set will have as a result what we ask or request. The objective of this research is to present which are the most widely used virtual platforms among teacher-student interaction due to the new modality that we are experiencing due to the Covid19 pandemic. The methodology implemented was descriptive and bibliographic design. The main results of the research show that the virtual platform with the most acceptance due to free access, its interface and versatility is Moodle (95.15%), standing out above other virtual platforms such as Chamilo (3.10) and Sakai (1.75) . Finally, as future research, it is proposed to carry out an interaction analysis of virtual platforms but this time focusing specifically on graduate and doctoral students to achieve a more exact knowledge between the instructional and educational processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Llerena Paz, M. A., & Arévalo Avecillas, M. E. . (2020). BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF TEACHER-STUDENT INTERACTION THROUGH VIRTUAL PLATFORMS. Espí­ritu Emprendedor TES, 4(4), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.33970/eetes.v4.n4.2020.230
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Manuel Andrés Llerena Paz, Universidad Católica de Santiago de Guayaquil, Ecuador, Instituto Superior Universitario Espíritu Santo

Research assistant at the Catholic University of Santiago de Guayaquil, I am currently an independent researcher.

Manuel Esteban Arévalo Avecillas, Tecnológico Universitario Espíritu Santo. Guayaquil, Ecuador.

Docente universitario de la carrera de Diseño Gráfico, del Instituto Superior Universitario Espíriru Santo 

References

Aguilar et al. (2020). Development of learning objects for the learning of data structures. Journal of Technology and Education Innovation, 6(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.24310/innoeduca.2020.v6i1.5297

Albano, G. e. (2020). Technology to enable new paradigms of teaching/learning in mathematics: the digital interactive storytelling case. Journal of e-learning and knowledge society, 16(1), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135201

Ame, C. (2020). Profile reliability to improve recommendation in social-learning context. Online Information Review, 44(2), 433-454. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2017-0068

Arana et ál. (2020). Improving Assessment Using Visual Learning Analytics. Education in the knowledge society(9), 21. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.21554

Area. (2009). E-learning: enseñar y aprender en espacios virtuales. Tecnología Educativa. La formación del profesorado en la era de Internet, 8, 391-424.

Becerro. (2009). Plataformas educativas, un entorno para profesores y alumnos. Temas para la educación, 2, 4-8.

Belloch. (2012). Entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Valencia: universidad de Valencia, 21, 10-15.

Berea. (2011). El alumno universitario cordobés y la plataforma virtual Moodle. Revista de Medios y Educación, 38, 121-128.

Bravo, M., & Miguel, C. (2009). Visible and Invisible Classrooms, and even Intelligent Ones. Educación Química, 20(3), 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(18)30033-8

Brown, R. (2001). The process of community building in distance learning courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 18-35. Obtenido de http:www.sloancwiki.org/wiki/index.php?title=The_Process_of_Communitybuilding_in_Distance_Learning_Classes% 2c_JALN_5 (2)

Buzón. (2005). Buzón-García, O. (2005). La incorporación de plataformas virtuales a la enseñanza: una experiencia de formación on-line basada en competencias. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 4(1), 77-100.

Cabrera et ál. (2019). Factors that enable the adoption of educational technology in medical schools. Educación Médica, 20(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2017.07.006

Capilla. (2017). Conectados a la ted y desconectados de la realidad. Revista de medios y comunicación, 50, 173-185.

Cedric, B. (2020). Beyond limits: Lecturers' reflections on Moodle uptake in South African universities. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10190-8

Cerezo et ál. (2015). Programs for promoting self-regulated learning in higher education: A study of the satisfaction between in-person and virtual methods. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejeps.2015.10.004

Cervantes. (2013). Importancia del uso de las plataformas virtuales en la formación superior para favorecer el cambio de actitud hacia las TIC: estudio de caso: Universidad del Magdalena. Revista Iberoamericana de evaluacion educativa, 6(1), 153-166.

Cesteros. (2009). Las plataformas e-learning para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje universitario en Internet. Eprints, 45-73.

Chao et ál. (2020). Web-based digital twin modeling and remote control of cyber-physical production systems. Robotics and computer-integrated manufacturing, 64(101956). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2020.101956

Chiarani. (2004). Chiarani, M. C., PianuccCriterios de evaluación de plataformas virtuales de código abierto para ambientes de aprendizajes colaborativos. In VI Workshop de Investigadores en Ciencias de la Computación.

Choi, A., & Hand, B. (2020). Students' Construct and Critique of Claims and Evidence Through Online Asynchronous Discussion Combined with In-Class Discussion. International Journal, 18(6), 1023-1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10005-4

Chun. (2015). Doing (critical) qualitative research in China in a global era. International Sociology, 30(1), 86-102.

Collado, J. (2016). ELE 2.0 as Teaching and RTrend in Foreign Language Teaching. Revista Fuentes, 18(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2016.18.2.04

Cordero, C., & Caballero, A. (2015). The Moodle platform: A useful tool for training in life support. Analysis of satisfaction questionnaires from students and instructors of the semFYC advanced life support courses. Atención Primaria, 4(6), 376-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aprim.2015.02.006

Deepak, K. (2017). Evaluation of Moodle Features at Kajaani University of Applied Sciences – Case Study. Procedia Computer Science(116), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.021

Díez, E., & Sánchez, S. (2015). Universal design for learning as a teaching method in order to meet the need for diversity in universities. Aula Abierta, 43(2), 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aula.2014.12.002

Duan, G. e. (2020). Bibliometric evaluation of the status ofPicearesearch and research hotspots: comparison of China to other countries. Journal of Forestry Research, 31(4), 1103-1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-018-0861-9

Estrella et ál. (2019). Mediating Role of Self-efficacy and Usefulness Between Self-regulated Learning Strategy Knowledge and its Use. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 24(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2018.08.001

Fernández. (2014). Mundos virtuales 3D para la comunicación e interacción en el momento educativo online/3D Virtual Worlds for interaction and communication in the online educational moment. Historia y comunicación Social, 19, 417-422.

Froment et ál. (2017). Análisis bibliométrico de la interacción profesor-alumno a través de las redes sociales. Píxel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 51, 53-67.

García, G. R. (2010). Modelos de interacción en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Topic digital, 19(1), 34-38.

García, J., & Nicasio, M. (2018). The Instructional Effectiveness of Two Virtual Approaches: Processes and Product. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 23(2), 117-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicod.2018.02.002

Gil et ál. (2020). A bibliometric analysis and systematic review of shipboard Decision Support Systems for accident prevention. Satefy Science, 128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104717

Giralt et ál. (2020). Giralt-Romeu, M., Liesa, E., & Castelló, M. (2020). I research, you research: do future teachers consider themselves researchers?(Yo investigo, tú investigas;¿ se consideran investigadores los futuros maestros? Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2020.1759001

Goktas. (2015). Physical Education and Sport Students. Anthropologist, 21(2), 18-30.

Gregori. (2005). El uso educativo de las aulas virtuales emergentes en la educación superior. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 2(2), 2-8.

Hernández. (2017). Aula invertida mediada por el uso de plataformas virtuales: un estudio de caso en la formación de profesores de física. Estudios pedagógicos, 43(3), 193-2014.

Ibanez et ál. (2016). Genetic algorithms and Gaussian Bayesian networks to uncover the predictive core set of bibliometric indices. Journal of the association for information science and technology, 67(7), 1703-1721. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23467

Ketter, V., & Ary, M. (2017). Information and Communication Technologies in higher education (face‐to‐face teaching): An analysis of the variables that influence its adoption. Revista de Gestão, 24(3), 247-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rege.2017.05.003

Lastra, J. (2012). Implementation of a virtual learning environment oriented towards business training. Estudios Gerenciales, 28(122), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0123-5923(12)70196-1

Li, Y. (2020). Design and Implementation of College English Grammar Teaching Interactive System Based on the Moodle Platform. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology(126), 396-370.

Llorente. (2005). Las plataformas virtuales en el ámbito de la teleformación. Revista electrónica Alternativas de educación y comunicación., 3, 45-52.

Ma et ál. (2020). Research on the construction and optimization of distributed Moodle course platform. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22276

Machynska, N., & Dzikovska, M. (2020). Challenges to Manage the Educational Process in the HEI during the Pandemic. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1), 92-99. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.1sup2/251

Manzares, R. e. (2020). Monitoring Students at the University: Design and Application of a Moodle Plugin. Applied Sciences - Basel, 10(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103469

Mascare, D., & Cabedo, J. (2014). Virtual learning environment and academic outcomes: Empirical evidence for the teaching of Management Accounting. Revista de Contabilidad, 17(2), 108-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2013.08.003

Medio et ál. (2020). MoodleREC: un sistema de recomendación para crear cursos utilizando la plataforma de aprendizaje electrónico moodle. Computadoras en el comportamiento humano, 104, 106-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106168

Méndez. (2013). Quehacer docente, TIC y educación virtual a distancia. Apertura, 5(2), 108-123.

Merello, P., & Grima, A. (2016). Moderar papel del género en la realización de cuestionarios de Moodle en un curso de contabilidad de introducción. Procedia - Ciencias sociales y del comportamiento, 228, 406-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.062

Moltó. (2009). Uso de herramientas TIC para la mejora de la interacción profesor-alumno, la evaluación continua y el aprendizaje autónomo. MOLTÓ, G., et al. Uso de herramientas TIC para la mejora de la interacción profesor-alumno, la evaluación continua y el aprendizaje autónomo. Jornadas de Innovación: Metodologías Activas para la Formación en Competencias & Estrategias de Evaluación Altern, 8, 12-17.

Morales, S. (2014). Perfeccionamiento docente virtual: Una experiencia con tutores/as. Perfiles Educativos, 36, 180-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-2698(14)70616-6

Noriega et ál. (2019). Designating criteria for educational technology assessment. Revista Médica, 20(2), 109-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edumed.2018.04.020

Núñez, I., & Seoanea, G. (2016). Wikis in Moodle: The students and teachers gaze. Revista Química, 27(4), 257-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eq.2016.08.001

Oliveira et ál. (2020). Subjective development process as a path to school learning: the classroom as a dialogic relational context. Studies in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02109395.2019.1710803

Ortega, L. (2015). Líneas de investigación sobre Educación Especial en España: un estudio bibliométrico (2006-2010). Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 21(2), 219-233.

Ortiz. (2005). Interacción y" TIC" en la docencia universiaria. Revista de Medios y Educación, 26, 27-38.

Parra et ál. (2020). Potencial De La Educacion a Distancia Para Reducir Brechas De Aprendizaje En Educacion Superior: Una Mirada Al Caso Colombiano. American Journal of Distangue Education, 34(2), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1756024

Parra, C. (2017). Virtual Teaching in Postgraduate Programmes: The Importance of Social Collaboration in Virtual Communities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 1430-1438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.223

Pozo et ál. (2020). Teachers' digital competence in using and analytically managing information in flipped learning. Culture education. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2020.1741876

Pyke et ál. (2019). Business undergraduates’ perceived use outcomes of Moodle in a blended learning environment: The roles of usability factors and external support. Telemática e informática, 31(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.10.001

Ramos et ál. (2016). Development of ICT applications to enhance the teaching and learning of science in grade of teacher in early childhood education at the University of Malaga. Revista Química, 27(3), 226-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eq.2016.04.006

Razzaque, A. (2020). M-Learning Improves Knowledge Sharing Over e-Learning Platforms to Build Higher Education Students' Social Capital. Sage Open, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020926575

Restrepo et ál. (2014). Alfabetización informática y uso de sistemas de gestión del aprendizaje (LMS) en la docencia universitaria. Revista de la Educación Superior, 43(171), 139-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2015.03.004

Salaka, L., & Wallace, C. (2020). How lecturers neutralize resistance to the implementation of learning management systems in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(2), 365-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-019-09238-7

Sánchez et ál. (2008). Aprendizaje cooperativo y formación del profesor. Un estudio bibliométrico (1997-2008). Anales de Documentación, 12, 209-220.

Soledad et ál. (2013). Campus Virtual y Facebook en el ámbito universitario. ¿Enemigos o aliados en los procesos de enseñanza y aprendizaje? Revista Química, 24(2), 255-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-893X(13)72470-4

Taberner, R. (2014). ¿Deberíamos incorporar nuevas tecnologías como material didáctico? Piel, 29(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.piel.2013.09.006

Vidal. (2004). Uso y evaluación de la plataforma de enseñanza-aprendizaje virtual" Blackboard". Revista de Medios y Educación, 24, 89-100.

Youtie, J. (2017). Crossing borders: A citation analysis of connections between Cognitive Science and Educational Research and the fields in between. Research Evaluation, 26(3), 242-255. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx020